Well, here I am back again in my old digs. Fancy. A spur-of-the-moment-just-because-I-feel like it move, (and because I feel the need for slipping back into the blog equivalent of a very comfy, if dubious and rather smelly, pair of old (stripey) socks. Contrariness indeed.
So 'ere tis.
My Book Club Mamas review of Anita Diamant's
The Red Tent. Warning: there may be some spoilers here, although I don't believe what I have said gives much away because the events in the novel are taken from
The Bible, and it is the emotional life of the novel that becomes central.
Funnily, I've been slightly hesitant about this one. Not sure how to come at it - on a blog that is. Very different to having a stab at this within the crumbling towers of academia. And funnily because it's such an...accessible (? for want of a better word) novel. And also having re-read it after a space of 5 years or so, I do feel quite clear on what I think of it all, and what I think it's about.
My hesitation may be due, not to the fact that it is a very popular and much-loved novel, (over a million copies sold worldwide since its initial publication in 1999), but because of an unusual reason. Unusual perhaps because normally I am so very not bugged by these things. That is, that I feel a certain weariness over the criticism this book has received from more conservative quarters. I don't want to get into any God arguments with anyone, and discussions of this book seem to provoke some very heated discussion on that front. And although I love a good debate and sometimes - just sometimes I actually miss academia for that very reason, I have no interest in engaging in a debate about the validity of Diamant's "history" as opposed to the, er...history the Bible presents...ahem...which seems to me like a lot of somewhat irrelevant barking up the wrong tree. I'd glaze over and have to check my pulse I'm afraid. I'd rather have a heated discussion about the fairies that live down the bottom of my garden. Well, they do - you have doubts hey?

The Red Tent: A Novel, by Anita Diamant. See? It says "novel".
So, let me say, I fail to see what all the knicker-twisting is about. I have studied the Bible, but not at any great length and only as a literary text - chiefly as an academic tool to decode other texts (many of which make liberal reference to the Big Ol' Book). And I find arguments regarding what is Truth, or not, as it may be a bit tedious. I'm all wrung out and (hung)over that one as a result of 3 years of undergrad Philosophy. Truth, (with a capital T) is a 21 year old boy with a guitar, a cigarette, a bottle of whiskey, and a Jack Kerouac obsession. Been there and done that way for too many late nights.
Ok. Down to business. Apologies for overstating the bleeding obvious dear reader, but The Red Tent being a novel - a piece of fiction and never claiming to be more (or less) so - rather than some kind of revisionist history of the Bibble as it has been accused of being - is to me an absorbing and imaginative excavation, and in a way (for the idealist that lurks in the hearts of many of us), a kind of recuperation of lost matrilineal "histories". These being oral histories, and "women's mysteries", in that they are of a nature that emphasise menstrual and birthing practices; and female rites of passage - so you can possibly imagine that sexuality and death are fairly well explored within the story.
The red tent in the novel is a place where the women of the tribe retreat to during menstruation and birth, and where men are not permitted. It is within the red tent that the majority of the first half of the book takes place.
Diamant has imagined these rites, and the lives of her female characters, (the male characters are as shadowy and unformed as the women of the Bible generally are), because imagination is pretty much all we have to fall back on. It is the imagining of female loss and also what has been lost. Of a rich spiritual tradition that was less in thrall of male gods and more connected to what we now perceive as the Divine Feminine. This is the idea the novel presents anyway.
And it is an imagining that depicts women in relation to one another - the woven complexities, conflicts and rivalries of these relationships - those of the wives of Jacob - which are central to the first section of the novel.
For myself as a reader, this approach suggests that Diamant is seeking to test, and interrogate the assumptions behind who holds the power to include or exclude, and who has the power to actively make and record history; with that, what particular stories are being singled out to be told and how these are being told. She doesn't throw out definitives, she throws up questions. She tests the echo - the hollowness of a history that has essentially excluded an entire sex (as authors of their own traditions and history).
The tale itself is set in, well, Biblical times, which is a rather nebulous pre-10 Commandments era. And it focuses on a particular oddity, (well, perhaps because it could be said to be highly ambiguous) ,that can be found in Genesis and which focuses on the rape, or "rape" (however the reader interprets this passage I don't think that's a spoiler) of Dinah, a daughter of Jacob. Jacob who, my word, had a lot of sons being one of those fecund Biblical forefathers who spread his seed and populated the earth etc. He had an awful lot of goats too it would seem.
Thusly, within this section of the Bible there is a lot of begetting, and er, begatting. Diamant pulls out these rather long and overwhelming lists of who gave birth to who (as seen in Genesis) and animates them - giving each birth a story and emotional life, and emphasising the feminine lines of descent. Female culture in the novel is not a "sub-culture" but an assertive and embodied presence or "ecology" to employ a more wanky, yet pretty term. And Dinah the central character, has many mothers - four in fact, who each figure as different aspects and representations - both symbolic and material - of the Feminine and its associated traditions, and artifacts, (for instance - midwife Rachel's birthing bricks), and who each give her different gifts. They also offer a challenge to traditional assumptions of male power.
And it is in Diamant's inversion of Dinah's rape in The Bible (because whether the rape is physical by her husband or psychological by her father and brothers it is a rape), which is the central premise and crucial dramatic act of the novel, and which Diamant engages to present her challenge to Patriarchal law, the law of the Father and God-centred authority.
The Red Tent conjures what has been unwritten and unrecorded, (feminists would argue that which has been effaced and excluded, others would say omitted or overlooked). That which has been spoken as poetry, song, ritual, community, celebration and grieving. That which evaporates and dies with memory. Diamant's is a speculative history, a fiction that attempts to give shape to and acknowledge the validity of oral forms of knowledge and which questions Absolutes and their claim upon Truth and History (and yes - those capitals are all painfully deliberate).
Personally, I found that I was more engaged with the second half of the book - which centred on Dinah's story. The first half of the novel was fascinating, but there were so many births, and the atmosphere of the red tent itself was so redolent and well-imagined, (to a somewhat stifling degree), that at times I felt like I needed to come up for air.
Also, because of all the begetting and begatting, it too felt like a relentless line of women popping out babies. A potted history of the tribes of the Fertile (literally!) Crescent. Entirely deliberate on Diamant's part I'm thinking. In the second half of the novel, the tale shifts in setting and focus, and the emotional life of Dinah comes to the fore, and her own experience of motherhood and loss is explored, as well as her path as midwife. In some ways it feels as though the novel is actually two books. First the tale of the Mothers of Dinah, and the second as Dinah, Daughter of the Wives of Jacob.
I find this a seductive novel, not least because I find it so richly imagined. Diamant's approach could so easily render a story little more than an academic protest, or a strident attempt at re-presenting a right-on preaching-to-the-converted-feminist treatise, and (as some have argued irrationally) an anachronistic tale. However the author infuses her characters - particularly Dinah - with an immediacy and emotional weight. I would disagree with some who would argue that Dinah is too emotionally distant, only because I quite enjoyed the fact that the character wasn't overdrawn, nor dramatically or operatically overblown.
Personally I was able to have an empathic response to Dinah's experience because every thought and detail of her response to her situation wasn't hammered out and overstated. In a way, and although I slightly cringe at the term, Dinah becomes an everywoman, (or everymother) because her story contains many of the recognisable elements or emotional resonances that are familiar to women on a visceral level. We are able to slip inside of Dinah, even though she is a world of (unrecorded) "history" away from us.
There's loads more I could say about the women's relationships with men, and Dinah's experience with her mothers and mother-in-law, as well as the cultural dislocation, and, well...loads isn't there. But maybe I can leave that to you?